Difference between revisions of "Project Proposals/Template"
From fd.io
(→Name) |
Dwallacelf (Talk | contribs) (→Meets Board Policy (including IPR, being within Board defined Scope etc)) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<!-- Please note: fd.io code is to be licensed under the Apache 2.0 license unless an exception is approved by the board --> | <!-- Please note: fd.io code is to be licensed under the Apache 2.0 license unless an exception is approved by the board --> | ||
| − | + | == Name == | |
| + | <!-- The name of your project, for example Honeycomb BridgeDomain or NSH Advanced Features etc. --> | ||
== Project Contact Name and Email == | == Project Contact Name and Email == | ||
| Line 62: | Line 63: | ||
== Meets Board Policy (including IPR, being within Board defined Scope etc) == | == Meets Board Policy (including IPR, being within Board defined Scope etc) == | ||
| − | Meets board policy as expressed in [https://fd.io/ | + | Meets board policy as expressed in [https://fd.io/docs/tsc/FD.IO-Project-a-Series-of-LF-Projects-LLC-Technical-Charter-12-13-2017-FINAL.pdf Technical Community Charter]. The details of Section 7. Intellectual Property Policy are especially important policy-wise. |
== Administrata == | == Administrata == | ||
Latest revision as of 21:15, 7 April 2022
Contents
Name
Project Contact Name and Email
Repository Name
Description
Scope
Initial Committers
Vendor Neutral
Meets Board Policy (including IPR, being within Board defined Scope etc)
Meets board policy as expressed in Technical Community Charter. The details of Section 7. Intellectual Property Policy are especially important policy-wise.
Administrata
- Request for Project proposal consideration
- Email: (place link to email to TSC proposing project, this can be obtained from TSC Archives
- Date: (date proposed, makes it simpler to calculate the pre-requisite 2 week time period of gestation before being permitted to be voted on)
