Difference between revisions of "VPP/nataas-test"

Latest revision as of 22:18, 13 March 2023

Measurement tools
Name	Pros	Cons
CSIT	Already has NAT tests Not difficult to add tests	Requires Robot knowledge Difficult to run locally
frouter-agent	Not difficult to add tests	Dependent on frouter Difficult to run locally
nat/extras	Simple to use Runs locally	Requires additional tooling to automate Existing scripts are stateless
Flent (netperf)		Does not work (on my computer)
IRTT	Able to run locally Complements Flent	Aims to test mainly latency, not throughput
PerfKitBenchmarker	Has iperf and wrk tests	Aimed at cloud services (most of the tests are unusable) Difficult to run locally
networkQuality		Only for macOS

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 ! Name !! style="color:green" | Pros !! style="color:red" | Cons
 |-
-| Flent ||
+| CSIT ||
-* N/A
+* Already has NAT tests
+* Not difficult to add tests
+||
+* Requires Robot knowledge
+* Difficult to run locally
+|-
+| frouter-agent ||
+* Not difficult to add tests
+||
+* Dependent on frouter
+* Difficult to run locally
+|-
+| nat/extras ||
+* Simple to use
+* Runs locally
+||
+* Requires additional tooling to automate
+* Existing scripts are stateless
+|-
+| Flent (netperf) ||
 ||
 * Does not work (on my computer)
 |-
 | IRTT ||
-* Example
+* Able to run locally
+* Complements Flent
 ||
-* Aimed to test latency
+* Aims to test mainly latency, not throughput
 |-
-| Example ||
+| PerfKitBenchmarker ||
-* Example
+* Has iperf and wrk tests
 ||
-* Example
+* Aimed at cloud services (most of the tests are unusable)
+* Difficult to run locally
+|-
+| networkQuality ||
+|
+* Only for macOS
 |}