Difference between revisions of "Sweetcomb/RPCop"
m (→Requirements) |
m (→Datastore) |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
=== Datastore === | === Datastore === | ||
− | First, NETCONF and RESTCONF protocol have been defined to use datastores [RFC 6241] & [RFC 8040] but not gNMI. | + | First, NETCONF and RESTCONF protocol have been defined to use datastores [RFC 6241] & [RFC 8040] but not gNMI. Though, gNMI support a datatype field in GetRequest which defines properties similar to a datastore. |
* NETCONF works with several datastores defined after. | * NETCONF works with several datastores defined after. | ||
* RESTCONF "provides only a writable unified datastore". (similar to NETCONF running datastore) | * RESTCONF "provides only a writable unified datastore". (similar to NETCONF running datastore) |
Revision as of 14:03, 1 April 2019
Contents
RPC Operations
This page aims at describing which data or error should be replied when a user uses a RPC method on sweetcomb control agent.
Context
Types of data
- Configuration data/desired state: "Configuration data is the set of writable data that is required to transform a system from its initial default state into its current state." RFC6241
- Operational data: "Operational state data is a set of data that has been obtained by the system at runtime and influences the system's behavior similar to configuration data. In contrast to configuration data, operational state is transient and modified by interactions with internal components or other systems via specialized protocols." RFC6244
"These two values may be different for a number of reasons, e.g., system internal interactions with hardware, interaction with protocols or other devices, or simply the time it takes to propagate a configuration change to the software and hardware components of a system." RFC8342
Datastore
First, NETCONF and RESTCONF protocol have been defined to use datastores [RFC 6241] & [RFC 8040] but not gNMI. Though, gNMI support a datatype field in GetRequest which defines properties similar to a datastore.
- NETCONF works with several datastores defined after.
- RESTCONF "provides only a writable unified datastore". (similar to NETCONF running datastore)
- gNMI communicate with a YANG speaking network device containing configuration and operational data. No notion of datastore exists.
In NETCONF environment, there available datastores:
- startup - RFC6241: Automatically handled by sysrepo and netopeer
- candidate - RFC6241: Automatically handled by sysrepo and netopeer
- running - RFC6241 : This is when changes are commited to running that VPP is configured
- intended - RFC8342: Not supported by sysrepo yet
- operational - RFC8342: Not supported by sysrepo yet
Architectures of datastores
Original Architecture from RFC 6241 | NMDA Architecture from RFC 8342 |
+-------------+ +-----------+ | <candidate> | | <startup> | | (ct, rw) |<---+ +--->| (ct, rw) | +-------------+ | | +-----------+ | | | | | +-----------+ | +-------->| <running> |<--------+ | (ct, rw) | +-----------+ | v operational state <--- control plane (cf, ro) ct = config true; cf = config false rw = read-write; ro = read-only boxes denote datastores |
+-------------+ +-----------+ | <candidate> | | <startup> | | (ct, rw) |<---+ +--->| (ct, rw) | +-------------+ | | +-----------+ | | | | | +-----------+ | +-------->| <running> |<--------+ | (ct, rw) | +-----------+ | | // configuration transformations, | // e.g., removal of nodes marked as | // "inactive", expansion of | // templates v +------------+ | <intended> | // subject to validation | (ct, ro) | +------------+ | // changes applied, subject to | // local factors, e.g., missing | // resources, delays | dynamic | +-------- learned configuration configuration | +-------- system configuration datastores -----+ | +-------- default configuration | | | v v v +---------------+ | <operational> | <-- system state | (ct + cf, ro) | +---------------+ |
Source: RFC8342
YANG tree architectures
Second, there are three types of organization of YANG trees:
- Openconfig style: 'config' and 'state' containers
- IETF withtout NMDA: two separate branches rooted at the root of the data tree: one branch for configuration data objects and one branch for operational state data objects.
- IETF with NMDA: leverage the targetted datastore to know if it is operational or configuration (running) data.
In order to know if your IETF model supports NMDA, please use YangCatalog.
RPC types
Third, as sweetcomb only supports NETCONF and gNMI, there are 5 RPCs supported:
- gNMI get
- gNMI set
- NETCONF get
- NETCONF get-config
- NETCONF edit-config
Requirements
Requirements for sysrepo and sweetcomb current datastore architecture RFC 6241
draw.io source can be found here
Future work: NMDA
For the moment, sweetcomb does not support NMDA. YANG models with an NMDA tree type MUST NOT be used with sweetcomb.