Difference between revisions of "VPP/nataas-test"

From fd.io
< VPP
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 5: Line 5:
 
|-
 
|-
 
| CSIT ||
 
| CSIT ||
* TBD
+
* Already has NAT tests
 +
* Not difficult to add tests
 
||
 
||
* TBD
+
* Requires Robot knowledge
 
|-
 
|-
 
| frouter-agent ||
 
| frouter-agent ||
 +
* Not difficult to add tests
 
||
 
||
 
* Dependent on frouter
 
* Dependent on frouter

Revision as of 20:40, 13 March 2023

Measurement tools
Name Pros Cons
CSIT
  • Already has NAT tests
  • Not difficult to add tests
  • Requires Robot knowledge
frouter-agent
  • Not difficult to add tests
  • Dependent on frouter
  • Difficult to run locally
nat/extras
  • Simple to use
  • Runs locally
  • Requires additional tooling to automate
  • Existing scripts are stateless
Flent (netperf)
  • Does not work (on my computer)
IRTT
  • Able to run locally
  • Complements Flent
  • Aims to test mainly latency, not throughput
PerfKitBenchmarker
  • Has iperf and wrk tests
  • Aimed at cloud services (most of the tests are unusable)
  • Difficult to run locally