Difference between revisions of "VPP/nataas-test"
From fd.io
< VPP
| (4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|- | |- | ||
! Name !! style="color:green" | Pros !! style="color:red" | Cons | ! Name !! style="color:green" | Pros !! style="color:red" | Cons | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | CSIT || | ||
| + | * Already has NAT tests | ||
| + | * Not difficult to add tests | ||
| + | || | ||
| + | * Requires Robot knowledge | ||
| + | * Difficult to run locally | ||
|- | |- | ||
| frouter-agent || | | frouter-agent || | ||
| − | * | + | * Not difficult to add tests |
|| | || | ||
* Dependent on frouter | * Dependent on frouter | ||
| + | * Difficult to run locally | ||
|- | |- | ||
| nat/extras || | | nat/extras || | ||
* Simple to use | * Simple to use | ||
| + | * Runs locally | ||
|| | || | ||
* Requires additional tooling to automate | * Requires additional tooling to automate | ||
| + | * Existing scripts are stateless | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | Flent || | + | | Flent (netperf) || |
| − | + | ||
|| | || | ||
* Does not work (on my computer) | * Does not work (on my computer) | ||
|- | |- | ||
| IRTT || | | IRTT || | ||
| − | * | + | * Able to run locally |
| + | * Complements Flent | ||
|| | || | ||
| − | * | + | * Aims to test mainly latency, not throughput |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | | PerfKitBenchmarker || |
| − | * | + | * Has iperf and wrk tests |
|| | || | ||
| − | * | + | * Aimed at cloud services (most of the tests are unusable) |
| + | * Difficult to run locally | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | networkQuality || | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | * Only for macOS | ||
|} | |} | ||
Latest revision as of 22:18, 13 March 2023
| Name | Pros | Cons |
|---|---|---|
| CSIT |
|
|
| frouter-agent |
|
|
| nat/extras |
|
|
| Flent (netperf) |
| |
| IRTT |
|
|
| PerfKitBenchmarker |
|
|
| networkQuality |
|
